Thursday, October 22
       

Acts of 1882

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

Chinese Exclusion Acts of 1882


On November 8, 2007, Diana H. and Danielle D. made a report to their class about the Chinese Exclusion Acts of 1882. This documentary was done over a week of hard work and fun. The report was well appreciated by mentors and classmates alike.

 

The Chinese Exclusion Act was a United States federal law signed by Chester A. Arthur on May 8, 1882, following revisions made in 1880 to the Burlingame Treaty of 1868.  Those revisions allowed the U.S. to suspend immigration, and Congress subsequently acted quickly to implement the suspension of Chinese immigration, a ban that was intended to last 10 years.  This law was repealed by the Magnuson Acton December 17, 1943.

  

                                                                                                                                                                                 

The Chinese Exclusion Act was one of the most significant restrictions on free immigration in U.S. history.  The Act excluded Chinese “skilled and unskilled laborers and Chinese employed in mining” from entering the country for ten years under penalty of imprisonment and deportation.  Many Chinese were relentlessly beaten just because of their race.  The few Chinese non-laborers who wished to immigrate had to obtain certification from the Chinese government that they were qualified to immigrate, which tended to be difficult to prove.  Volpp argues that the “Chinese Exclusion Act” is a misnomer, in that it is assumed to be the starting point of Chinese exclusionary laws in the United States.  She suggests attending to the intersections of race, gender, and U.S. citizenship in order to both understand the restraints of such a historical tendency and make visible Chinese female immigration experiences, including the Page Act of 1875.

The Act also affected Asians who had already settled in the United States.  Any Chinese who left the United States had to obtain certifications for reentry, and the Act made Chinese immigrants permanent aliens by excluding them from U.S. citizenship.   After the Act’s passage, Chinese men in the U.S. had little chance of ever reuniting with their wives, or of starting families in their new homes.

Amendments made in 1884 tightened the provisions that allowed previous immigrants to leave and return, and clarified that the law applied to ethnic Chinese regardless of their country of origin.  The Scott Act (1888) expanded upon the Chinese Exclusion Act, prohibiting reentry after leaving the U.S.  The Act was renewed for ten years by the 1892 Geary Act, and again with no terminal date in 1902.   When the act was extended in 1902, it required “each Chinese resident to register and obtain a certificate of residence. Without a certificate, he or she faced deportation.”

Between 1882 and 1905, about 10,000 Chinese appealed against negative immigration decisions to federal court, usually via a petition for habeas corpus.  In most of these cases, the courts ruled in favor of the petitioner.  Except in cases of bias or negligence, these petitions were barred by an act that passed Congress in 1894 and was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in U.S. vs Lem Moon Sing (1895).  In U.S. vs Ju Toy (1905), the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed that the port inspectors and the Secretary of Commerce had final authority on who could be admitted.  Ju Toy’s petition was thus barred despite the fact that the district court found that he was an American citizen.  The Supreme Court determined that refusing entry at a port does not require due process and is legally equivalent to refusing entry at a land crossing.  This ruling triggered a brief boycott of U.S. goods in China.

One of the critics of the Chinese Exclusion Act was the anti-slavery/anti-imperialist Republican Senator George Frisbie Hoar of Massachusetts who described the Act as “nothing less than the legalization of racial discrimination.”

The laws were driven largely by racial concerns; immigration of persons of other races was unlimited during this period.

On the other hand, many people strongly supported the Chinese Exclusion Act, including the Knights of Labor, a labor union, who supported it because it believed that industrialists were using Chinese workers as a wedge to keep wages low.   Among labor and leftist organizations, the Industrial Workers of the World were the sole exception to this pattern.  The IWW openly opposed the Chinese Exclusion Act from its inception in 1905. 

Effects and Aftermath

A political cartoon from 1882, showing a Chinese man being barred entry to the “Golden Gate of Liberty”.  The caption reads, “We must draw the line somewhere, you know.”

For all practical purposes, the Exclusion Act, along with the restrictions that followed it, froze the Chinese community in place in 1882, and prevented it from growing and assimilating into U.S. society as European immigrant groups did.  Limited immigration from China continued until the repeal of the Chinese Exclusion Act in 1943.  From 1910 to 1940, the Angel Island Immigration Station on what is now Angel Island State Park in San Francisco Bay served as the processing center for most of the 56,113 Chinese immigrants who are recorded as immigrating or returning from China; upwards of 30% more who showed up were returned to China.  Furthermore, after the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, which destroyed City Hall and the Hall of Records, many immigrants (known as “paper sons”) claimed that they had familial ties to resident Chinese-American citizens.  Whether these were true or not cannot be proven.

The Chinese Exclusion Act gave rise to the first great wave of commercial human smuggling, an activity that later spread to include other national and ethnic groups.

Later, the Immigration Act of 1924 restricted immigration even further, excluding all classes of Chinese immigrants and extending restrictions to other Asian immigrant groups.  Until these restrictions were relaxed in the middle of the twentieth century, Chinese immigrants were forced to live a life apart, and to build a society in which they could survive on their own.

Furthermore, the Chinese Exclusion Act did not address the problems that whites were facing; in fact, the Chinese were quickly and eagerly replaced by the Japanese, who assumed the role of the Chinese in society.  Unlike the Chinese, some Japanese were even able to climb the rungs of society by setting up businesses or becoming truck farmers.  However, the Japanese were later targeted in the National Origins Act of 1924, which banned immigration from east Asia entirely.

The Chinese Exclusion Act was repealed by the 1943 Magnuson Act, which permitted Chinese nationals already residing in the country to become naturalized citizens and stop hiding from the threat of deportation. It also allowed a national quota of 105 Chinese immigrants per year. Large scale Chinese immigration did not occur until the passage of the Immigration Act of 1965.  Despite the fact that the exclusion act was repealed in 1943, the law in California that Chinese people were not allowed to marry whites was not repealed until 1948.

Even today, although all its constituent sections have long been repealed, Chapter 7 of Title 8 of the United States Code is headed, “Exclusion of Chinese.”  It is the only chapter of the 15 chapters in Title 8 (Aliens and Nationality) that is completely focused on a specific nationality or ethnic group.

Source:  From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

 

 

 

Share.